Guano (1)

Comments that seem to me to be in violation of the game rules will be moved here, and closed to further comment.  Do not regard having your post moved here as a reprimand, merely as a referee’s whistle. 🙂

Feel free to comment on them at any other peanut gallery of your choice.

1,658 thoughts on “Guano (1)”

  2. Appeals to authority are fallacious.

    Citation please. If someone is questioning my claims on what evolutionary biologists say, who or whaat else am I supposed to reference?

    You never “support” your claims.

    Nice projection.

    Ignoring reality won’t make your religious beliefs or assertions true.

    Yet you seem to think it makes your religious beliefs and assertions true.

    IDC will never replace science. Get used to it.

    IDC exists only in the minds of the willfully ignorant. Get used to it.

  4. Elizabeth:
    I’ve invited Dr Sewell to join us.I do hope he will.

    There is no way he will show up here to address a bunch of willfully ignorant evo TARDs.

  5. Trying to drum up traffic,Joe? I’m sure he’s tempted to go to a venue moderated by a YEC.

  6. Creodont: The vast majority of the people of this world have never heard the phrase “mutation become fixed in a wild population” and couldn’t care less, and you’re avoiding my questions.

    You avoid everything. I will avoid you.

    For the purpose of my point I don’t care what the paper demonstrated, except that it proves that your claim is 100% wrong.

    Maybe you think it does…

  7. Creodont: One thing I know for sure is that there is a difference between evolution and the theory of evolution.

    Of course evolution is okay with fish evolving into fish. The theory of evolution is also okay with fish evolving into fish. Who said it isn’t?

    LoL! You can’t even follow your own complaints.

  8. Rich: Are you claiming an intelligent intenty could make the smaller system but could design the real universe?

    I am asking you to support your tripe.

  9. Joe G: For ONE, the earth/ moon system would fall into the Sun without any counter-balance- we need that external pull to help keep us in place.
    Obviously you don’t have much of a physics background. And obviously all you have are “why” questions that 5 year olds ask.

    What utter giberish, a physics fail of epic proportions. I might have to post that on FSTDT.

  11. Rich: What utter giberish, a physics fail of epic proportions. I might have to post that on FSTDT.

    Exactly the substance-free response I expected.

  12. Toronto:
    Joe G,

    I have to admit, what you lack in “sciencey”, you make up for in “funny”!

    Thanks for being that sole island of “functionally specified humour” amongst all these serious people.

    This will be the term we can use when IDists can’t answer a question.

    As an example: “That answer has FSH. No one can calulate how much, but with that amount of laughter, it must have been a lot.”

    Toronto,

    I get it- you are another clueless evo who just got handed a nice plate of crow.

  13. Rich: It delights me, actually. Comedy like you is rare.

    And Captain Coward evoTARDs like you are a dime a dozen. That delights me…

  14. Rich: its always ongoing, Joe.

    You’re stuck in first grade.

    He might put you straight with regard to your complete miscomprehension of basic physics.

    Richie Needledick with more false accusations.

    I wouldn’t even trust you with my toaster now.

    Your mother trusts me…

  16. Joe G: OMG another Captain Coward substance-free comeback…

    Oh I want this to play out to its delicious fullness, with you mangling and miscomprehending physics all the way along. Its mean, I know, but you’ve done little to deserve charity. Oleg is nicer than me, though. This may be (non)calculation of CSI of CAEK good.

  18. Rich: *passes popcorn*

    Liz– can we give Joe a new thread to examine this new physics he’s proposing?

    Can we give Rich a new thread where he can play with his Captain Coward persona?

  20. Rich: Someone or something still has to MAKE it, though.

    Yup- do you have a point?

    Design is NOT both.

    Yes, it is.

    Simple proof: Not everything ever designed has been made.

    But everything designed and made was made by design.

    But, tell us more about the earth falling into the sun in this simple system.

    YOU are the simple system Rich. Deal with it.

  21. Rich: Joe we were talking about a designer with universe creating abilities. And You said:
    “Joe G: For ONE, the earth/ moon system would fall into the Sun without any counter-balance- we need that external pull to help keep us in place.
    Obviously you don’t have much of a physics background. And obviously all you have are “why” questions that 5 year olds ask.”

    Do you still stand by that?

    CONTEXT, Rich- so yes in CONTEXT, I stand by that. However YOU don’t want to understand the context and want to quote me out-of-context. Typical Captain Coward move.

  22. Rich:
    So to be clear, a simple system ofone star a planet and moon will inevitably have the planet falling into the star because it’s not ‘balanced’ (?!?) by other masses?

    If you’re not happy with this description, please give your own, more detailed one.

    Such a system only exists in your little bitty mind. That is all I have to say about it.

  24. Wow Joe. I’ve seen you argue some pretty stupid positions before but this latest brain fart – not understanding the simple physics of gravity and orbiting bodies – really deserves a prize.

  25. Rich:
    *This is the lull where he’s reading wikipedia, horrified*

    Horrified implies understanding.

    My money’s on searching for quote mines.

  27. dr who

    The only reason that you’d have to think that they are artifacts would be if you knew of an animal on this planet which designed and made such things with intent.

    Look I get it- you don’t have any evidence that nature can produce an insect.

    They’re produced by purely physical processes in large numbers every day.
    Not by nature. Only insects produce insects on this planet.

    But anyway if you ever find some evidence taht nature can produce an insect I will read about it in some peer-reviewed article. Until then you have nothing.

  29. Joe G: Another dumbass chimes in with substance-free drivel-

    Being part of nature does not mean produced by nature.

    In other words, the questions are too difficult for you. Heck, go figure.

  31. and again:

    OK so it is settled- RichTARDs universe with only one star and one planet/ moon system would not be a better universe than our current universe for making scientific discoveries.

  32. Joe G:
    and again:

    OK so it is settled- RichTARDs universe with only one star and one planet/ moon system would not be a better universe than our current universe for making scientific discoveries.

    Bread pudding.

  35. Joe G: Again Oleg’s failure to follow along proves that he is a coward.

    Nice job ace.

    It’s supposed to rain tomorrow.

  39. Joe G: No, your boyfriend will be pissing on you tomorrow- golden showers, not rain.

    Chicken dumplings and a cold dark beer.

  41. Joe G: I get it- you are totally clueless and scientifically illiterate. Now go play in traffic…

    Are there rainbows in hell?

  45. Joe G:
    Creodont2- you do not have to continue to prove that you are a blathering idiot. We already know.

    Is the Titanic a part of “nature”?

  47. Joe G: The angels that fly out of your arse?

    Are angels produced by “nature? Are angels a part of “nature? How much CSI is there in an angel?

  49. Creodont2: Castles made of sand, slip into the sea, eventually.

    Thank you for making a mockery of Lizzie’s blog.

    Nothing like an evoTARD throwing a hissy fit- good job ace…

  50. Joe G: Thank you for making a mockery of Lizzie’s blog.

    Nothing like an evoTARD throwing a hissy fit- good job ace…

    Nice projection.

    My dog can beat up your god.

    Graham crackers in milk.

    Enter sandman.

Comments are closed.